Loading cart…
No products in the cart.
History: how it was made
Grant Wood painted Daughters of Revolution in 1932, and the work grew directly out of a personal grievance with the local chapter of the Daughters of the American Revolution in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Wood had been commissioned to design a set of stained glass windows for the Veterans Memorial Building in that city, and he subcontracted the fabrication work to a studio in Germany because no American facility at the time had the technical capacity to execute his designs to the standard he required. The local DAR chapter launched a public campaign against him, arguing that it was unpatriotic to send the commission overseas. The criticism stung Wood, and he responded not with words but with paint.
He depicted three women who are clearly meant to represent members of the organization, each one clutching a teacup with an air of rigid propriety. Behind them, he placed a reproduction of Emanuel Leutze's famous painting Washington Crossing the Delaware, the very image of patriotic sacrifice and democratic daring that the women invoke as their symbolic inheritance. The juxtaposition is deliberate and pointed. Wood completed the painting during a period of intense creative productivity that followed the national success of American Gothic, and it demonstrated that his artistic vision was not limited to nostalgic celebration of rural life. He was equally capable of wielding paint as an instrument of social critique, though he always maintained that humor rather than malice was his guiding intention. The work entered the collection of the Cincinnati Art Museum, where it has been regarded as one of his most psychologically complex achievements.
What makes this painting extraordinary
The composition of Daughters of Revolution is carefully structured to produce its satirical effect through purely visual means. Wood arranges the three women in a shallow horizontal band across the lower portion of the picture plane, their shoulders nearly touching, their bodies forming a kind of frieze. Each face is distinctive and observed with the kind of merciless specificity that characterizes the best caricature, yet the technique is never crude. The paint surface is as smooth and controlled as anything Wood produced, the contours of each face defined with the same lapidary precision he applied to the pitchfork and farmhouse of American Gothic.
The placement of the Leutze painting in the background is a masterstroke of compositional irony. Washington Crossing the Delaware, with its churning ice and heroic figures straining against the cold, occupies the upper portion of the picture and radiates a kind of violent, democratic energy that stands in sharp contrast to the comfortable, tea-sipping complacency of the three women below. Wood painted the background reproduction with deliberate flatness, as if it were a wallpaper pattern rather than a living image, which subtly suggests that these women relate to their patriotic heritage as decoration rather than as lived commitment. The warm peach and pink tones of the women contrast with the cool blues of the historical scene behind them, reinforcing the sense of a gulf between the rhetoric of patriotism and its comfortable domestic performance. This painting is available as a hand-painted oil reproduction, offering collectors the chance to own one of the most pointed and visually precise satirical works in American art history.
What does Daughters of Revolution mean?
The meaning of Daughters of Revolution operates on several levels simultaneously, which is part of what makes it such a durable and fascinating work. At its most immediate level it is a personal retort, a witty and pointed response from an artist to the people who had publicly questioned his patriotism over a business decision they did not understand. In this sense it belongs to a long tradition of artists using their medium to settle scores with grace and intelligence rather than with mere argument. Wood translates private irritation into public art, and in doing so he elevates his grievance into something that speaks to universal questions about authenticity, gatekeeping, and the ownership of collective memory.
At a deeper level, the painting raises lasting questions about who gets to define national identity and on what basis. The women in the painting are the biological descendants of Revolutionary War participants, and they wear that lineage as a badge of exclusive cultural authority. Wood asks, gently but unmistakably, whether inherited bloodlines constitute a more legitimate claim to patriotism than the active, daily work of building and sustaining a community. By placing the actual image of revolutionary struggle directly behind these comfortably self-satisfied figures, he creates a visual argument that the spirit of the founding era and the social performance of the organization named after it may not be the same thing at all. This nuanced, visually articulate social commentary is exactly why the painting continues to be taught, exhibited, and discussed. Bringing a hand-painted oil reproduction of Daughters of Revolution into your collection means owning a work that rewards repeated viewing and sustained thought.
